Texas Election Day: Kilgore ISD $ 113M Bond Package Adopted; first results show changes on the way to approval | Local news


Kilgore ISD voters passed a $ 113 million bond election as voters across Texas appeared ready to pass eight state constitutional amendments, according to unofficial results released Tuesday by Gregg and Rusk Counties.

Kilgore ISD’s bond consists of two proposals. Proposition A totals $ 109 million to build a new Kilgore High School campus and renovate the Chandler Elementary. Proposal B, for a total of $ 4 million, is to fund renovations at RE St. John Stadium.

In a statement, Kilgore thanked ISD “parents, community members and district workers who have helped identify current needs in the school district and who have volunteered their time and resources to create and distribute information about the choice of school loan to the community “.

“This high level of support from our Bulldog community shows the passion and pride our community has for our students and Kilgore schools,” said Superintendent Andy Baker Education Our Students and the Future of the Kilgore Independent School District. “

Gregg County reported 571 votes for Proposal A or 64.96% and 308 votes against Proposal A or 35.04%.

Gregg County reported 526 votes for Proposal B or 59.84% and 353 votes against Proposal B or 40.16%.

With 80% of the counties, Rusk County reported 560 votes for Proposal A or 60.94% and 359 votes against. The county reported 496 votes for Proposal B or 54.03% and 422 votes against.

Constitutional amendments

Voters across Texas had an opportunity to vote on eight constitutional amendments Tuesday. And initial unofficial results showed that all eight proposals were ready for approval.

These proposed amendments to the Texas Constitution were passed as draft law during this year’s legislature. A majority of Texas voters must pass these changes at this election in order for them to be incorporated into the constitution.

At around 10:30 p.m., with more than half of the polling stations across the country, the results were:

Thesis 1: 84% for, 16% against

This constitutional amendment would allow charitable raffles to be held at rodeo events.

A constitutional amendment is proposed to allow charitable foundations of professional sports teams to hold raffles at rodeo events.

This is not currently allowed as professional rodeos are not defined as a professional sports team in the law.

As such, the change would also define “an organization sanctioned by the Professional Rodeo Cowboy Association or the Women’s Professional Rodeo Association” as a professional sports team.

If this change is passed, non-profit raffles can be held at both professional games and rodeo events.

Thesis 2: 63% for, 37% against

This constitutional amendment would allow a county to issue bonds for the development or rehabilitation of infrastructure or transport in devastated areas (places showing signs of neglect).

The law currently allows registered cities and towns to issue bonds for this purpose. If the change is passed, the counties would also get approval.

The change would also include that counties that issue bonds for the purpose of traffic improvement cannot require more than 65% higher value tax revenues to repay bonds.

The ad valorem tax revenue is based on the estimated value of a taxable property, product or service.

Also, bonds cannot be used by the county to build, operate, maintain, or purchase a toll road.

Thesis 3: 65% for, 35% against

This constitutional amendment would prohibit the state and political subdivisions from restricting religious services or organizations.

The passage of this new amendment would mean that no laws, rules, ordinances or proclamations could be made by the state or by the political subdivisions relating to religious services or organizations.

During COVID-19, cities like Bexar, Dallas, Denton, El Passo, Harris, Lubbock, and more in Texas were restricting people’s ability to gather at church services. This change prevents this from happening again.

Thesis 4: 60% for, 40% against

This constitutional amendment would change the eligibility requirements for some judicial offices.

Individuals in the Supreme Court Justice offices, an appeals court judge, and an appeals court judge are eligible only if they are a 10 year Texas licensed practicing attorney or a Texas licensed practicing attorney and a judge of a state or court District Court for 10 years.

During this time their license cannot be revoked, suspended or suspended on probation.

For district judges, the change would change the admission requirements from the required four years as a practicing lawyer or judge to eight years. During this time, their license to practice medicine may not have been revoked, suspended or suspended on probation.

Thesis 5: 60% for, 40% against

This constitutional amendment would give the state commission on judicial conduct additional powers to handle complaints against persons running for judicial office.

The State Commission on Judicial Conduct could also investigate and discipline candidates, as it is currently allowed.

You can currently discipline through warnings, private or public sanctions, resignation in lieu of disciplinary action, suspensions, public admonitions, public warnings or public reprimands.

Thesis 6: 88% for, 12% against

This constitutional amendment would give residents of care facilities, assisted living facilities, transitional care facilities or government-supported residential centers the right to designate a caregiver for personal visits.

A constitutional amendment could not at any time prohibit this important reference person from visiting the resident. The Texas state legislature could also provide guidelines for facilities that establish visiting policies and procedures for caregivers.

This change is intended to prevent restrictions in these facilities such as those put in place in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. No minor visitors were allowed into these facilities at this time.

Thesis 7: 88% for, 12% against

This constitutional amendment would allow the surviving spouse, 55 or older, of a disabled person to maintain a homestead property tax cap at the time of death if they remain on the homestead.

This tax limit applies to property taxes for the school district.

To qualify, the individual must also receive disability benefits from the Federal Old Age, Survivors’ and Disability Insurance Program, which is provided by the Social Security Administration

In this case, property taxes would not increase from the year in which the person is entitled.

It would also introduce a temporary provision for the reimbursement of taxes to the spouse of a deceased disabled person. This applies to the tax years 2020 and 2021, which exceed the amount that would have had to be paid after adding the tax limit.

Thesis 8: 88% for, 12% against

This constitutional amendment would allow total or partial property tax exemption for surviving spouses of military personnel who were killed or fatally injured while on duty.

The current constitution exempts surviving spouses from the fallen. The change would also include those killed or fatally injured during training or other military duties.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.