Proposed changes to the NDIS pose an “enormous risk” to its future


However, disability advocates and policy advisors have expressed widespread concern that the laws also contain an excess of power.

The focus is on reforms that would give the chief executive of the National Disability Insurance Agency new powers to modify or change a participant’s funding plan.

Those fears were voiced by several witnesses who appeared before a Senate hearing on Friday.

Professor Bruce Bonyhady – the original chairman of the NDIA – said the proposed laws were a marked departure from the “careful” and “considered” advice of the Tune review.

“Participants are asked to support the hasty introduction of a bill that would fundamentally change the NDIS,” he said at the hearing.

“It’s just not stackable.”

Continue reading

Image for read more article 'The federal government has abandoned its controversial independent NDIS assessment plan'

The government believes the changes are necessary in order to be able to respond to emergencies such as: B. when additional support needs to be provided after a participant has visited a hospital.

It also states that the changes are in line with the powers already contained in the NDIA law, but would ensure that the process of reviewing a participant’s plan is “less disrupted”.

NDIS Minister Linda Reynold said this is because the current rules require the review of an “entire plan” rather than the implementation of specific changes.

Continue reading

Image for read more article 'Disabled Refugee Says Bad Sleep After Release From Immigration Custody'

But Mr Bonyhady said it was “just not true” that the proposed legislation was as “straight forward and consistent” as the government had suggested.

“I see few positive benefits from this legislation and enormous risks to the NDIS vision,” he said.

“The proposed changes in this bill are the most significant since the NDIS began.”

The Department of Social Services and NDIA said the powers could only be exercised if they respect a participant’s “goals and aspirations” and were deemed “appropriate and necessary”.

Continue reading

Image for read more article 'Disability pension applicants must be treated with dignity, says Human Rights Officer'

National Ethnic Disability Alliance’s chief research and policy officer, Blanca Ramirez, said the laws had not put clear restrictions on the use of the powers.

“We are deeply concerned about the proposed power of the CEO to change an attendee’s plan,” she said at the hearing.

“The law itself does not impose any restrictions on the CEO’s power.”

Patrick McGee of the Australian Federation of Disability Organizations also said the limited four-week consultation period only added to the sector’s distrust of the government.

“What are you hiding – we don’t have enough time to [do the] Review, ”he said.

Continue reading

Image for read more article 'More than every second application for a disability pension is still rejected'

Similar concerns were raised by Patrick McGee of the First Nations Disability Network, who said the community had not had enough time to review the law’s impact on indigenous communities.

“We still have no confidence that the NDIA understands the lived experience of people with disabilities in the First Nations,” he said.

La Trobe University law professor Dr. Darren O’Donovan said while the “bones of a good bill” were in place, “unclear rules” and “unhealthy discretion” undermined their current condition.

Maurice Blackburn’s attorney Tom Ballantyne also said the reforms would effectively give the agency “full powers” to change the assistance funded in a participant’s plan.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.